I liked this video, but there is some things that I think people are missing.
1. He gets applause when he mentions that there are people nowadays that wait for the "thrill" of being offended. I would argue that these people have been around for a long time, but there are not more of them than previously known, they can just get organized much faster than any time in history. Terry Rakolta was outraged about what she saw on "Married...With Children" and she was able to turn her outrage into appearances on talk shows and she even founded an organization, Americans for Responsible Television. At the time (1989), she had a few advantages. She was well-to-do and more than likely had access to people of power and prominence. If you offended by something and you wish to complain, much of the above can be achieved if you have internet access.
2. To those who say, "Well, you couldn't make a show like THAT nowadays", I understand the sentiment, but I feel they miss the point. That show belongs to that time. With or without timely references or changes in standards, society at that moment allowed _____ to be a success, or well thought of. Some things stay funny, some things don't, some things need context. Times change. Cleese, as a member of Monty Python and in "Fawlty Towers", has used some pretty offensive racial terms, yet, when Cleese mentions the great time he had on stage, he says, "African-American", which is generally accepted. Hearkening back to context, Basil Fawlty was a "monster" to use Cleese's past descriptions of him, so to have him use enlightened terminology would not make sense.
If you do not believe that "woke" was an issue years ago, look at this clip. It is time-coded to start when the offended party (a plumber, not the actress Louise Beavers), talks to Groucho Marx
When one uses "Politically Correct" or "Woke" in a derogatory manner, some view this as a license. Well, ____ said it, why can't I? I would argue that it would be better if you are _____ when you say it. This is not to say that all comedians are perfect and just and should be given a pass, but I AM saying that the truly good and great have earned their artistic licenses whereas most have not and that some artists need to know that these licenses may need to be renewed. George Carlin went from a double act to a single, from doing character bits to observational humor to social commentary. Henny Youngman worked the same much of his life, he just changed out one-liners. Samantha Bee would not and doesn't harp constantly on the Bush Administration.
I prefer the term "responsible". Be responsible for what you say. The art comes whether folks find it funny or not. The audience, however, should also know what they're getting into and should not cry foul if they were warned. One should not go to, say Lisa Lampanelli and expect .cheeky, well-intentioned Bible commentary.
Free Speech is expensive.
